Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the NEW Photosapien. Please read the "Welcome to Photosapien" and "How to Join" posts in the ADMISSION forum.
 
   Home   Help Search Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What?  (Read 358 times)
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 389


Do you look at or through a photo?


« on: August 13, 2010, 09:18:22 PM »

Truth is universally
Objective…
Emotion is universally
Subjective…
Ambiguity is what
Happens when
They collide.

Which is, I guess, what artists do?




Logged

eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2010, 10:48:35 PM »

First off, some philosophical comment: I do not agree that the truth is universally objective. Truth differs from a Democrat to a Republican, from rich to poor, from a victim to a victimizer, from a woman to a man, from a child to an adult, etc., etc., etc... In my view, the truth is just as subjective as is the emotion. So, building on that, I will have to assume, that what artists do is an interaction of truth and emotion which often ends up as an ambiguity. Sorry for twisting your statement this way. ( Smiley Smiley Smiley )

I can see at least two kinds of emotion in this photo. Ambiguity? Yes, I can see that, too. The truth is more difficult to extract, though.

Since you have posted this entry also in the Post-Processing Techniques category, I imagine that you expected comments on your technique, as well. Your dramatic colors are certainly eye-catching and most likely intended to enhance the emotional content. I got nothing against that. But, to be honest, I visualize this photo in black&white and I think that it would have more impact that way.
Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 799


« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2010, 07:43:23 PM »

For me, this is definitely an ambiguous collision of "truth" and "emotion" in what you've created.

I'm intrigued by your approach, and enjoy that you show us some of the seams or separations that define the interaction.

Overall, though, it doesn't hold together for me. I don't believe it enough to weave a story among the characters, yet at the same time wonder why you're deliberately showing the artist's hand -- and am unclear about that statement.

Ambiguous, indeed.
Logged

Regards,
April

Photos: "http://www.flickr.com/photos/bungalow104/"
Just the other day (a photoblog): "www.bungalow104.com"
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC