Did you do any dodging/burning to maximize this? or was it this stunning from the get go?
Well, a bit of both. I usually am stunned by a scene, and then try to capture that moment on the chip. Then at home in my digital darkroom, I try to use the tools to bring that wow effect I personally had in the real situation back into the shot. That might require some exaggeration, like the contrast here. But I usually just try to get the shot to the same perception effect it had in real for me.
Here, I was laying on the bed, looking up to the window, and thus had a steep viewing angle. The light from the sunrise really made the drops shin in some parts, while the still rather dark blue sky gave a strong contrast in the other parts of the drops.
But to get a decent DOF, I had to shoot much more parallel, and then I tried to bring back that wow effect I had when lying on the bed, looking up to the drops on the window.
So, yes, these shots, especially those of the Traces series, usually come from moments of stunning over the beauty of nature. But I use Photoshop to try to bring the digital views of those moments to that level of stunning.
And, please, there's LOTS of stuff you can complain about. E.g. that I always use just one lens: my trusty old, small, light weight Sigma 18-200mm travel lens... (With the exception of a few macro shots).

Seriously, usually I spot ten flaws per shot- but not before I uploaded it to public forums.

cheers
®