Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the NEW Photosapien. Please read the "Welcome to Photosapien" and "How to Join" posts in the ADMISSION forum.
 
   Home   Help Search Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Time Heals Everything  (Read 767 times)
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 389


Do you look at or through a photo?


« on: April 05, 2009, 10:19:40 PM »

I was listening to music somewhere and a song came onto the radio... And like one of those insidious melodies it sniggered its way into my mind... Even though I'd heard it only once... I kept humming and whistling the damned thing, without even knowing the words. So finally, I downloaded it from iTunes and without warning... the poetry manipulated my emotions making me want to somehow express this endless heartbreak particularly now... in Spring when... When children-who-have-become-abruptly-forty-years-old feel the first pull of what Spring does... And what Spring can leave in its wake.

Here's the URL to that song... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiOt5Yjni-Y&feature=PlayList&p=B0C214F7A78560E6&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=67

And here's my feeling of her feeling...
...



Logged

aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 799


« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2009, 05:51:27 PM »

So beautifully wistful; soft like fading memories; rain like tears; a window into the past, but eyes looking to the future.

Somewhere between the tenderness of youth, and the maturity of heartbreak.

And I thought I was a romantic?!  Smiley

I have no idea how you accomplish what you do, technically. But am in awe -- particularly with the delicate touch here -- of how that is  is subordinate to what you intend to express.
Logged

Regards,
April

Photos: "http://www.flickr.com/photos/bungalow104/"
Just the other day (a photoblog): "www.bungalow104.com"
habakuk
The Pixelator
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1866



« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2009, 06:35:52 PM »

While the music didn't stroke a string in me... the picture does. It's all about the eyes and the mouth and you beautifully arranged the color and the light in a way that makes it so easy to stay right there. Rain drops like tears, how fitting to the look. Yet the color of the background (upper left), the cheeck, the lips and the shirt are so full of tender love, which is complemented by the bright white "flower" in her hair.

It is one of those shots that talk so much without being blunt, that touches me without being rude. If I wanted to make thoughts and emotions, hope and disillusion of a girl visible - I'd wanted do it this way.

if I had a wish for this shot: either include the heart necklace or get rid if it. I don't really need it - as I am taken away by those eyes and the mouth...

cheers
®
Logged

eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2009, 03:22:29 PM »

I didn't listen to the music, yet. But what I see, reminds me of the "Wuthering Heights" by Emily Brontė and the song of the same title sang by Kate Bush. And generally, I have to agree with both of the above comments in regard to the way this image affects me...

P.S. Now that I did listen to the music, I must say that I prefer Bernadette Peters as a movie actress (my opinion is that she is greatly underrated in that capacity). As much as this song may be of great value to Broadway lovers, I just do not appreciate it that much, even though I think she put a lot of feeling in it. Perhaps that's because I got an aversion to this kind of music in general... Anyway, I am glad that I did not listen to Ted's linked Broadway tune before commenting on his photo.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2009, 04:17:35 PM by eob » Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 389


Do you look at or through a photo?


« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2009, 10:09:17 AM »

Usually I don't like to talk about my images technically... this is an exception. The original was taken in the searing sun of midday at some f stop smaller than a gnat's eye. So I was dealing with almost monochrome contrast, and an image so sharp one could use it to shave. But I'd captured an expression which i knew that a director could never coax from an actress (which is the greatest contribution of candid street photography). So, how to eliminate all of the competitive business in the background and foreground (note that blur in the lower left... it is a perfectly focused rear of a boy's head)? Plus she wore a greenish metal clip in her hair, and a bow that was, again, both sharper and brighter than a laser.

And I wanted to do this one with as few seams showing as possible. I wanted the viewer to suspend disbelief. Okay... what to do?

"Ahah!" I says to myself, "Self, you can use the raindrips that you shot on the side of your car last year. The car was uniformly silver... so... remove the silver and leave the drops."

I thanked myself because I understood that the rainy-window illusion would allow viewer minds to accept my enhancements. Of course your technical grasp instantly  reveals the impossibility of  the DOF in this image, right? Tack sharp close foreground, blurred middle foreground. Sharp subject - then wonderful bokeh in the distance.

Your mind says, "Oh, of course. That's a cheap pane of glass through which Ted is shooting so that it is causing spherical mischief that is causing the selective pockets of wet-blur in the foreground (boy's head) and the foreground bow and hair clip... even her bangs (although they might possibly be motion blurred) while also explaining the lack of contrast throughout the image and gentle softnes upon her skin.

"Look!" your mind mutters. "This must be the effect of the window pane because it even allowed her locket to stay in focus while causing her dress, shoulder, and arm to become gradual wet smears. Yeah, the locket is just the detail that sells it... sure it's a tad distracting, but so is  life and it assures you that this is  a genuine capture."

So y'see... this does hang on a technical conceit... that it is all accomplished through some window, or perhaps as a reflection. And of course I wanted the rain flecks to suggest tears and gentle storm... so I created the darkness to allow the negative space to showcase the tear/drops and again sell the device even though I allowed few if any raindrops to hover over her face itself...

To come full circle... I'm pleased with the way that the technique was able to essentially make this dance of light and shadow work. And I reeeeely appreciate your concentration upon the poignancy of that girl's expression and feeling what I felt as I carefully created, "Time Heals Everything".  Wink
Logged

eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2009, 04:22:42 PM »

For me, your explanation is an another proof of a technique being equally (if not more, in many instances) important as a concept itself. And your technique turned out to be flawless...
Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 799


« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2009, 06:42:06 PM »

I'd love to be a fly on the wall and watch you work on an image some time.

Along with the wonderful layering of ideas, it's the looseness -- not to be confused with sloppiness -- which so appeals to me in the result. Despite your control, the image flows...
Logged

Regards,
April

Photos: "http://www.flickr.com/photos/bungalow104/"
Just the other day (a photoblog): "www.bungalow104.com"
ilchkai
Serious
Full Member
*
Posts: 228



« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2009, 07:14:21 AM »

usually, overly processed images put me off straight away

but, ted, you have done it again: this is a wonderful image! paradoxically, the heavy post processing seems to be done with the lightest of touches.

thanks for sharing


kai

Logged
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 389


Do you look at or through a photo?


« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2009, 08:29:29 PM »

Hmmmm... I like to think of my technique as, um, delicately enhanced. Sigh.... but regardless, thanks a lot everyone - she speaks to me about a time in everyone's life when the only hope is that, "Time heals everything...."
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC