Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the NEW Photosapien. Please read the "Welcome to Photosapien" and "How to Join" posts in the ADMISSION forum.
 
   Home   Help Search Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ...and The Snow Fell  (Read 643 times)
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 275


Photography Madness


« on: April 22, 2009, 06:46:13 AM »


...and The Snow Fell
..and The Snow Fell
Covering Dreams and Ideas...
Logged

http://ernestdlutek.ownlog.com/
"A passion for photography, combined with a love of fine equipment."
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 389


Do you look at or through a photo?


« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2009, 07:44:48 AM »

I wish I'd created these.
Logged

Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 275


Photography Madness


« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2009, 11:01:42 AM »

Thanks Smiley
Logged

http://ernestdlutek.ownlog.com/
"A passion for photography, combined with a love of fine equipment."
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2009, 05:02:40 PM »

I like both shots - for different reasons. But I would definitely consider getting rid of color which just doesn't work for me at all, and converting them into B&W.
Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
habakuk
The Pixelator
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1866



« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2009, 07:38:10 PM »

I like the way the buildings have that drastic distortion. This is very much a comic style of showing buildings and I love that. I'd probably go for a duotone version, tho.

cheers
®
Logged

Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 275


Photography Madness


« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2009, 06:34:54 PM »

Don't you think that B/W would looks too dark? There's not much light in there, colors are quite similiar too.
Logged

http://ernestdlutek.ownlog.com/
"A passion for photography, combined with a love of fine equipment."
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2009, 06:44:48 PM »

Well, this depends entirely on one's personal taste. So, I am not going to try and convince you that the B&W version would be better. But...

I happen to think that shadows have at least as much signal (as in signal-to-noise ratio) as lights. Dark images very often provide more mood or feeling than light ones. Besides, you could easily make these images appear lighter if you wanted to. That's what we have Photoshop for... Smiley
Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 275


Photography Madness


« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2009, 06:59:15 PM »

Wink
Well i'll try and put something tomorrow
Logged

http://ernestdlutek.ownlog.com/
"A passion for photography, combined with a love of fine equipment."
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 799


« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2009, 07:02:47 PM »

I'll also cast my vote for b&w. I love the geometric distortion of the buildings in the first, with the angular pathways; and the circular distortions of light with the driving snow down into the second. But in both, the color of light takes me into the mundane instead of the magic of snowfall in the night.
Logged

Regards,
April

Photos: "http://www.flickr.com/photos/bungalow104/"
Just the other day (a photoblog): "www.bungalow104.com"
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member
*
Posts: 275


Photography Madness


« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2009, 11:02:42 AM »

OK it takes me couple days more, because of some little vacations I had here in Poland on 1-3rd May. Here you have some b/w versions of both:

Logged

http://ernestdlutek.ownlog.com/
"A passion for photography, combined with a love of fine equipment."
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 1322



« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2009, 05:15:59 PM »

I like the B&W version better. Now that the color is gone, I can more easily concentrate on graphic elements.

That leads me to a realization that I am not too fond of the square crop in the first photo. I think, there is too much snowy area in the foreground. In my opinion, that photo is about the building, not snow and footprints. I would probably crop off the bottom at the level just underneath the path leading to the left. Another option for me (if I wanted to keep the snowy foreground) would be to shoot vertically from a little longer distance but retaining this surreal perspective - perhaps by shooting from the ground level.
Logged

Regards,
eob

_______________________________________

Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers;
Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur
*
Posts: 799


« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2009, 06:12:46 PM »

I definitely think the second is more effective in b&w.

But was surprised to see that the power of distortion seems minimized in the first. To address that, I agree with eob about a lower crop although I wouldn't take it so far up. Perhaps, instead, to a level where the angle of the foreground path intersects with a "vertical" line of the leftmost building?

An interesting study; thank you for sharing the variations.

Logged

Regards,
April

Photos: "http://www.flickr.com/photos/bungalow104/"
Just the other day (a photoblog): "www.bungalow104.com"
ilchkai
Serious
Full Member
*
Posts: 228



« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2009, 06:23:31 AM »

the first image works better in colour for me, it is the subtle colour scheme, subdued palette of orange, red and yellow gives something to the image, a warmth which is lost in the b&w.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC