Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 275
Photography Madness
|
 |
« on: April 22, 2009, 06:46:13 AM » |
|
 ...and The Snow Fell..and The Snow Fell Covering Dreams and Ideas...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ted Byrne
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 389
Do you look at or through a photo?
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2009, 07:44:48 AM » |
|
I wish I'd created these.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 275
Photography Madness
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2009, 11:01:42 AM » |
|
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 1322
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2009, 05:02:40 PM » |
|
I like both shots - for different reasons. But I would definitely consider getting rid of color which just doesn't work for me at all, and converting them into B&W.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards, eob
_______________________________________
Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers; Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
|
|
|
habakuk
The Pixelator
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 1866
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2009, 07:38:10 PM » |
|
I like the way the buildings have that drastic distortion. This is very much a comic style of showing buildings and I love that. I'd probably go for a duotone version, tho.
cheers ®
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 275
Photography Madness
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2009, 06:34:54 PM » |
|
Don't you think that B/W would looks too dark? There's not much light in there, colors are quite similiar too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 1322
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2009, 06:44:48 PM » |
|
Well, this depends entirely on one's personal taste. So, I am not going to try and convince you that the B&W version would be better. But... I happen to think that shadows have at least as much signal (as in signal-to-noise ratio) as lights. Dark images very often provide more mood or feeling than light ones. Besides, you could easily make these images appear lighter if you wanted to. That's what we have Photoshop for... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards, eob
_______________________________________
Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers; Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
|
|
|
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 275
Photography Madness
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2009, 06:59:15 PM » |
|
 Well i'll try and put something tomorrow
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 799
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2009, 07:02:47 PM » |
|
I'll also cast my vote for b&w. I love the geometric distortion of the buildings in the first, with the angular pathways; and the circular distortions of light with the driving snow down into the second. But in both, the color of light takes me into the mundane instead of the magic of snowfall in the night.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ernest
Serious
Sr. Member

Posts: 275
Photography Madness
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2009, 11:02:42 AM » |
|
OK it takes me couple days more, because of some little vacations I had here in Poland on 1-3rd May. Here you have some b/w versions of both:  
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eob
Administrator
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 1322
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2009, 05:15:59 PM » |
|
I like the B&W version better. Now that the color is gone, I can more easily concentrate on graphic elements.
That leads me to a realization that I am not too fond of the square crop in the first photo. I think, there is too much snowy area in the foreground. In my opinion, that photo is about the building, not snow and footprints. I would probably crop off the bottom at the level just underneath the path leading to the left. Another option for me (if I wanted to keep the snowy foreground) would be to shoot vertically from a little longer distance but retaining this surreal perspective - perhaps by shooting from the ground level.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards, eob
_______________________________________
Dyson "Slim" vacuum with accessory suckers; Kitchen Aid double-capacity toaster!
|
|
|
aprilS
Serious
Photosapien Dinosaur

Posts: 799
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2009, 06:12:46 PM » |
|
I definitely think the second is more effective in b&w.
But was surprised to see that the power of distortion seems minimized in the first. To address that, I agree with eob about a lower crop although I wouldn't take it so far up. Perhaps, instead, to a level where the angle of the foreground path intersects with a "vertical" line of the leftmost building?
An interesting study; thank you for sharing the variations.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ilchkai
Serious
Full Member

Posts: 228
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2009, 06:23:31 AM » |
|
the first image works better in colour for me, it is the subtle colour scheme, subdued palette of orange, red and yellow gives something to the image, a warmth which is lost in the b&w.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|